Effectiveness of an ECM-derived biomaterial in promoting post-operative tissue regeneration after tooth extraction

Relevance. Tooth extractions are one of the most common surgical procedures in dentistry. Tissue regeneration at the extraction site plays a vital role in restoring the affected area. Various methods are available to accelerate and improve the quality of tissue regeneration in dental practice. Extracellular matrix (ECM)-derived biomaterials provide a wide range of therapeutic and regenerative benefits due to their unique biological properties. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an ECM-derived biomaterial in promoting post-operative tissue regeneration after tooth extraction.

Materials and methods. The study included two groups of patients: an experimental group (N = 46) and a control group (N = 46), all of whom underwent tooth extractions. The groups were compared based on two key parameters: the time required for complete wound surface healing and the time to achieve complete radiographic wound healing. Statistical analysis was conducted using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test for independent samples. The incidence of complications between the groups was analyzed using Fisher's exact test.

Results. The analysis of wound surface healing times between the groups revealed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). Post-operative tissue repair occurred at a significantly faster rate in the group treated with the extracellular matrix (ECM)-derived biomaterial compared to the control group.

Conclusion. Tissue regeneration at the surgical site after tooth extraction is a manageable process. Advances in modern biomaterials have facilitated accelerated tissue healing and functional recovery, leading to improved quality of life for patients.

1. Passarelli PC, Pagnoni S, Piccirillo GB, Desantis V, Benegiamo M, Liguori A, et al. Reasons for tooth extractions and related risk factors in adult patients: a cohort study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17(7):2575. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072575

2. Azzolino D, Passarelli PC, De Angelis P, Piccirillo GB, D'Addona A, Cesari M. Poor Oral Health as a Determinant of Malnutrition and Sarcopenia. Nutrients. 2019;11(12):2898. doi: 10.3390/nu11122898

3. Suzuki S, Sugihara N, Kamijo H, Morita M, Kawato T, Tsuneishi M, et al. Reasons for tooth extractions in Japan: the second nationwide survey. Int Dent J. 2022;72(3):366-372. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2021.05.008

4. Aljafar A, Alibrahim H, Alahmed A, AbuAli A, Nazir M, Alakel A, et al. Reasons for permanent teeth extractions and related factors among adult patients in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Scientific World Journal. 2021;2021:5534455. doi: 10.1155/2021/5534455

5. Ali D. Reasons for extraction of permanent teeth in a university dental clinic setting. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry. 2021;13:51-57. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S294796

6. Udeabor SE, Heselich A, Al-Maawi S, Alqahtani AF, Sader R, Ghanaati S. Current Knowledge on the Healing of the Extraction Socket: A Narrative Review. Bioengineering (Basel). 2023;10(10):1145. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10101145

7. Decker AM, Matsumoto M, Decker JT, Roh A, Inohara N, Sugai J, et al. Inhibition of Mertk Signaling Enhances Bone Healing after Tooth Extraction. J Dent Res. 2023;102(10):1131-1140. doi: 10.1177/00220345231177996

8. Toma AI, Fuller JM, Willett NJ, Goudy SL. Oral wound healing models and emerging regenerative therapies. Transl Res. 2021;236:17-34. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2021.06.003

9. Belov DI. The use of plasma rich growth factors (PRGF), in the directed tissue regeneration after surgical and dental intervention. Vestnik nauki. 2022;2(7):192- 203 (In Russ.). Available from: https://www.xn----8sbempclcwd3bmt.xn--p1ai/article/6027

10. Mamytova AB, Sulaimanov IB. The use of modern osteoregenerative materials in the bone defects of the maxillofacial region. Vestnik KRSU. 2020;20(9):107-114 (In Russ.). Available from: http://vestnik.krsu.edu.kg/archive/157/6666