Gas-producing potential of intestinal microbiota representatives in patients with post-infarction cardiosclerosis
https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3759-2024-1006
Abstract
Relevance. Analyzing the spectrum of gaseous signaling molecules (GSM) produced and consumed by the intestinal microbiota in patients with post-infarction cardiosclerosis (PICS) is essential for understanding their potential role in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular complications and for identifying strategies to address these conditions. Purpose. To investigate the prevalence and abundance of specific intestinal microbiota representatives isolated from patients with post-infarction cardiosclerosis (PICS) and to examine the species diversity and concentrations of microbial gaseous signaling molecules in this population.
Materials and methods. This case-control study involved the analysis of stool samples from 35 healthy individuals (14 men and 21 women) aged 45–60 years (mean age: 51.8 ± 4.8 [49; 56] years) and 34 patients with PICS (19 men and 15 women) aged 40–84 years (mean age: 64.5 ± 8.1 [53; 72] years). Gaseous signaling molecules (CO, CH₄, NO, H₂S) were quantified using gas chromatography.
Results. Patients with post-infarction cardiosclerosis exhibited a functional microbial imbalance marked by disrupted production of gaseous signaling molecules (GSM) compared to healthy individuals. In the PICS group, Lactobacillus spp. were observed to exclusively absorb NO, whereas in healthy individuals, Lactobacilli produced NO at a statistically significant higher mean concentration of 5.283 µg/mL (p < 0.001). Additionally, Staphylococcus aureus in the PICS group produced CO at levels 880 times higher than those observed in healthy individuals, a difference that was also statistically significant (p < 0.001).
Conclusion. Restoring the functional activity of the intestinal normal microbiota in patients with PICS is essential. Through the production of gaseous signaling molecules (primarily NO and CO), the normal microbiota can support neuromodulatory, cardiomodulatory, immunomodulatory, and other beneficial functions that are critical for the rehabilitation process.
About the Authors
Y. V. ChervinetsRussian Federation
Yulia V. Chervinets, MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Head of the Department of Microbiology and Virology with a Course of Immunology
4 Sovetskaya Str., Tver, Russian Federation, 170100
E. V. Stepanova
Russian Federation
Emma V. Stepanova, MD, PhD student, Department of the Microbiology and Virology with a course in immunology
Tver
V. M. Chervinets
Russian Federation
Vyacheslav M. Chervinets, MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Department of the Microbiology and Virology with a course of immunology
Tver
V. S. Belyaev
Russian Federation
Vsevolod S. Belyaev, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of the Microbiology and Virology with a course of immunology
Tver
References
1. Kajtmazova NK. Gut microbiota and its impact on the body. Modern Issues of Biomedicine. 2022;6(3):72- 78 (In Russ.). doi: 10.51871/2588-0500_2022_06_03_8
2. Afzaal M, Saeed F, Shah YA, Hussain M, Rabail R, Socol CT, et al. Human gut microbiota in health and disease: Unveiling the relationship. Frontiers in Microbiolology. 2022;13:999001. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.999001
3. Hou K, Wu ZX, Chen XY, Wang JQ, Zhang D, Xiao C, et al. Microbiota in health and diseases. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. 2022;7:135. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-00974-4
4. Falà AK, Álvarez-Ordóñez A, Filloux A, Gahan CGM, Cotter PD. Quorum sensing in human gut and food microbiomes: Significance and potential for therapeutic targeting. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2022;13:1002185. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1002185.
5. Sharma S, Mohler J, Mahajan SD, Schwartz SA, Bruggemann L, Aalinkeel R. Microbial Biofilm: A Review on Formation, Infection, Antibiotic Resistance, Control Measures, and Innovative Treatment. Microorganisms. 2023;11(6):1614. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11061614.
6. Liu J, Tan Y, Cheng H, Zhang D, Feng W, Peng C. Functions of Gut Microbiota Metabolites, Current Status and Future Perspectives. Aging and Disease. 2022;13(4):1106-1126. doi: 10.14336/AD.2022.0104
7. Bui TVA, Hwangbo H, Lai Y, Hong SB, Choi YJ, Park HJ, et al. The Gut-Heart Axis: Updated Review for The Roles of Microbiome in Cardiovascular Health. Korean Circ J. 2023;53(8):499-518. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2023.0048
8. Arrigo E, Comità S, Pagliaro P, Penna C, Mancardi D. Clinical Applications for Gasotransmitters in the Cardiovascular System: Are We There Yet? International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023 Aug 5;24(15):12480. doi: 10.3390/ijms241512480
9. Roy R, Wilcox J, Webb AJ, O'Gallagher K. Dysfunctional and Dysregulated Nitric Oxide Synthases in Cardiovascular Disease: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;24(20):15200. doi:10.3390/ijms242015200
10. Liu H, Huang Y, Huang M, Wang M, Ming Y, Chen W, et al. From nitrate to NO: potential effects of nitratereducing bacteria on systemic health and disease. European Journal of Medical Research. 2023;28(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01413-y
11. Lundberg JO, Carlström M, Weitzberg E. Metabolic Effects of Dietary Nitrate in Health and Disease. Cell Metabolism. 2018;28(1):9-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.06.007
12. Giuffrè A, Vicente JB. Hydrogen Sulfide Biochemistry and Interplay with Other Gaseous Mediators in Mammalian Physiology. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2018;2018:6290931. doi:10.1155/2018/6290931
13. Nagpure BV, Bian JS. Interaction of Hydrogen Sulfide with Nitric Oxide in the Cardiovascular System. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2016;2016:6904327. doi: 10.1155/2016/6904327
14. Cacanyiova S, Berenyiova A, Kristek F. The role of hydrogen sulphide in blood pressure regulation. Physiological Research. 2016;65(3):273-289. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.933438
15. Tomasova L, Dobrowolski L, Jurkowska H, Wróbel M, Huc T, Ondrias K, et al. Intracolonic hydrogen sulfide lowers blood pressure in rats. Nitric Oxide. 2016;60:50-58. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2016.09.007
16. Blachier F, Andriamihaja M, Larraufie P, Ahn E, Lan A, Kim E. Production of hydrogen sulfide by the intestinal microbiota and epithelial cells and consequences for the colonic and rectal mucosa. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 2021;320(2):125-135. Erratum in: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2021 Apr 1;320(4):G484. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00261.2020.
17. Maharshak N, Ryu HS, Fan TJ, Onyiah JC, Schulz S, Otterbein SL, et al. Escherichia coli heme oxygenase modulates host innate immune responses. Microbiology and Immunology. 2015;59(8):452-65. doi: 10.1111/1348-0421.12282
18. Kim HH, Choi S. Therapeutic Aspects of Carbon Monoxide in Cardiovascular Disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018;19(8):2381. doi: 10.3390/ijms19082381
19. Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, Addolorato G, Ammirati E, Baddour LM, et al. Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases Writing Group. Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990-2019: Update From the GBD 2019 Study. Journal of The American College of Cardiology. 2020;76(25):2982-3021. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010
20. Karpov YuA, Barbarash OL, Boschenko AA, Kashtalap VV, Kukharchuk VV, Mironov VM, et al. Eurasian Guidelines for the diagnostics and management of stable coronary artery disease. Eurasian heart journal. 2021;(3):54-93 (In Russ.). doi: 10.38109/2225-1685-2021-3-54-93
21. Nebyvaev IY, Paramonova YA. Features of management of patients with postinfarction cardiosclerosis in outpatient practice. E-Scio. 2019;(12):81-90 (In Russ.). Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42327940
22. Mironov AYu. Gas chromatography and mass-spectrometry in diagnosis of anaerobes. 2012;(26):45-51. (In Russ.). Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17911245
23. Luhachack L, Nudler E. Bacterial gasotransmitters: an innate defense against antibiotics. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 2014;21:13-7. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2014.06.017. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
24. Natarajan A, Winner JG. Gasotransmitters: a review. International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology. 2023;12(4):607-615. doi: 10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20231900
25. Althaus M, Clauss WG. Clauss Gasotransmitters: novel regulators of ion channels and transporters. Frontiers in Physiology. 2013;21:4:272013. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00027
26. Sun W, Du D, Fu T, Han Y, Li P, Ju H. Alterations of the Gut Microbiota in Patients With Severe Chronic Heart Failure. Frontiers in Microbiolology. 2022;31;12:813289. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.813289
27. Liu H, Chen X, Hu X, Niu H, Tian R, Hui W, et al. Alterations in the gut microbiome and metabolism with coronary artery disease severity. Microbiome. 2019;7(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0683-9
28. Chen X, Zhang H, Ren S, Ding Y, Remex NS, Bhuiyan MS, et al. Gut microbiota and microbiota-derived metabolites in cardiovascular diseases. Chinese Medical Journal. 2023;5;136(19):2269-2284. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002206
29. Tiso M, Schechter AN. Nitrate reduction to nitrite, nitric oxide and ammonia by gut bacteria under physiological conditions. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0119712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119712
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Chervinets YV, Stepanova EV, Chervinets VM, Belyaev VS. Gas-producing potential of intestinal microbiota representatives in patients with post-infarction cardiosclerosis. Parodontologiya. 2024;29(4):409-418. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3759-2024-1006