Preview

Parodontologiya

Advanced search

Analysis of the transverse dental arch dimension stability and risk of gingival recessions associated with orthodontic treatment

https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3759-2023-795

Abstract

Relevance. Orthodontic treatment may adversely affect the periodontal health. Therefore, a comprehensive diagnosis and treatment planning with a periodontist are crucial. Dentoalveolar expansion is one of the ways to provide the space for malocclusion correction. Nevertheless, the stability of the obtained transverse dimensions remains insufficiently studied and requires additional research.
Material and methods. The comparative study included the clinical and paraclinical stages. The inclusion and exclusion criteria determined the study sample formation. Each patient had orthodontic treatment with the same standard arch-changing protocol recommended by the manufacturer; the average treatment duration was 18 ± 4 months. All patients underwent a clinical examination specifically focused on the gingival recession diagnosis. During the paraclinical stage, the study investigated medical records and measured study model parameters using Pont’s (1909) and Linder-Hart (1939) indices. Measurements were made four times during orthodontic treatment: before, immediately after, one and six years after treatment. All obtained data were statistically processed using the significance criteria.
Results. Study models’ analysis during the active stage of treatment revealed expansion in each segment of the dentition. However, the result is prone to relapse within the first year after the bracket system removal. Clinical examination of the oral cavity revealed gingival recessions, which appeared during the active stage of the orthodontic treatment. Thus, every third case showed marginal tissue displacement. The comparison of the initial transverse dimensions in the study and control groups detected a discrepancy between the measured and reference values, which might be a prerequisite for determining new parameters.
Conclusion. A periodontist should monitor orthodontic patients to protect periodontal health. The transverse dimensions appeared to increase to the utmost in the upper and lower premolar regions. However, the achieved result does not always remain stable. Most relapses occur during the first year after the orthodontic treatment; then, the outcome remains stable.

About the Authors

L. N. Soldatova
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University; "Alfa-Dent" Dental Center
Russian Federation

Lyudmila N. Soldatova, DMD, PhD, DSc, Associate Professor, Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics; Chief Physician

Saint Petersburg



A. V. Shefova
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University; “Vident” Dental Chain
Russian Federation

Anastasiya V. Shefova, DMD, Clinical Resident, Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics

Saint Petersburg



References

1. Abou-Arraj RV, Kaur M, Alkhoury S, Swain TA, Geurs NC, Souccar NM. The new periodontal disease classification: Level of agreement on diagnoses and treatment planning at various dental education levels. J Dent Educ. 2021;85(10):1627-1639. doi: 10.1002/jdd.12636

2. Orekhova LYu, Kudryavtseva TV, Loboda ES, Neyzberg DM. Causation of gingival recession. Antibacterial and antiinflammatory parts of complex treatment. Parodontologiya. 2017;22(4):20-23 (In Russ.) Available from: https://www.parodont.ru/jour/article/view/103

3. Lineberger MB, Franchi L, Cevidanes L, Huanca Ghislanzoni LT, McNamara JA, Jr. Three-dimensional digital cast analysis of the effects produced by a passive self-ligating system. Eur J Orthod. 2016;38(6):609–614. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv089

4. Al-Ibrahim HM, Hajeer MY, Burhan AS, Sultan K, Ajaj MA, Mahaini L. The efficacy of accelerating orthodontic tooth movement by combining self-ligating brackets with one or more acceleration methods: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2022;14(12): e32879 doi: 10.7759/cureus.32879

5. Feu D. Orthodontic treatment of periodontal patients: challenges and solutions, from planning to retention. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 2021;(25):79-116. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.25.6.079-116.sar

6. Orekhova LYu, Chibisova MA, Serova NV. Clinical-beam characteristics of the chronic generalized periodontitis. Parodontologiya. 2013;18(3):3-9 (In Russ.). Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_20794604_15671365.pdf

7. Christensen JR, Fields H, Sheats RD. Treatment planning and management of orthodontic problems. In: Nowak AJ, Christensen JR, et al, editors. Pediatric Dentistry. Elsevier, 2019. pp. 512-553 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-60826-8.00036-5

8. Nastri L, Nucci L, Carozza D, Martina S, Serino I, Perillo L, et al. Gingival Recessions and Periodontal Status after Minimum 2-Year-Retention Post-Non-Extraction Orthodontic Treatment. Applied Sciences. 2022;12(3):16-41. doi: 10.3390/app12031641

9. Jedliński M, Grocholewicz K, Mazur M, Janiszewska-Olszowska J. What causes failure of fixed orthodontic retention? Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies. Head Face Med. 2021;17(1):32. doi:10.1186/s13005-021-00281-33

10. Atik E, Taner T. Stability comparison of two different dentoalveolar expansion treatment protocols. Dental Press J Orthod. 2017;22(5):75-82. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.22.5.075-082.oar

11. McNamara Jr JA, Franchi L, McClatchey LM.N. Orthodontic and orthopedic expansion of the transverse dimension: A four decade perspective. Seminars in Orthodontics. 2019;25(1):3-15. doi: 10.1053/j.sodo.2019.02.002

12. Grassia V, d'Apuzzo F, DiStasio D, Jamilian A, Lucchese A, Perillo L. Upper and lower arch changes after Mixed Palatal Expansion protocol. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2014;15(4):375-380. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269772357_Upper_and_lower_arch_changes_after_Mixed_Palatal_Expansion_protocol

13. Raucci G, Pacheco-Pereira C, Elyasi M, D’Apuzzo F, Flores-Mir C, Perillo L. Short- and long-term evaluation of mandibular dental arch dimensional changes in patients treated with a lip bumper during mixed dentition followed by fixed appliances. Angle Orthod. 2016;86(5):753–760. doi: 10.2319/073015-519.14

14. Housley JA, Nanda RS, Currier GF, McCune DE. Stability of transverse expansion in the mandibular arch. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124(3):288-293. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00450-5

15. Lucchese A, Manuelli M, Albertini P, Ghislanzoni LH. Transverse and torque dental changes after passive selfligating fixed therapy: A two-year follow-up study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019;156(1):94–103. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.08.019

16. Agashina MA, Fishchev SB, Lepilin AV, Dmitrienko SV, Balahnichev DN. Parameters of the dental arches, upper and lower jaws in the transversal directions. Pediatric dentistry and dental prophylaxis. 2017;16(1):36-39 (In Russ.). Available from: https://www.detstom.ru/jour/article/view/41/42

17. Tecco S, Tetè S, Perillo L, Chimenti C, Festa F. Maxillary arch width changes during orthodontic treatment with fixed self-ligating and traditional straight-wire appliances. World J Orthod. 2009;10:290–294. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20072744/


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Soldatova LN, Shefova AV. Analysis of the transverse dental arch dimension stability and risk of gingival recessions associated with orthodontic treatment. Parodontologiya. 2023;28(4):437-443. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3759-2023-795

Views: 210


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1683-3759 (Print)
ISSN 1726-7269 (Online)