Preview

Parodontologiya

Advanced search

Comparative study of the degree of fixation of complete removable prostheses of the lower jaw with attachment to another number of implants and their classical analogues

https://doi.org/10.25636/PMP.1.2018.1.16

Abstract

The relevance of the research. Study the possibility of using a small number of implants in prosthetic treatment of patients of elderly and senile age with complete loss of teeth on the lower jaw is important. Not currently described methods and devices used to objectively measure the extent and quality of fixation of complete removable denture implant of the lower jaw. Purpose. Instrumental assessment of the degree of fixation of full dentures of the lower jaw, based on a different number of implants. Materials and methods. The object of the study were 43 people with a diagnosis of complete loss of teeth on the lower jaw, which were divided into 2 groups according to type of manufactured construction: 1 group (22 persons) - fixation of the prosthesis on a single implant, the 2nd group (21 persons) - fixation of the prosthesis on two implants. The power of fixation (retention and stabilization) was determined before implantation of the prosthesis, after 3 and 12 months (application for invention No. 2016148504 from 09.12.2016). Results. The indices of retention of the prostheses in the first group after implantation increased from 337,28 ± 34,99 g to 1462,50 ± 204,22 g, and stabilization with 212,86 ± 20,05 g to 613,05 ± 144,88 g. In the second group of indicators of retention after implantation increased with 323,67 ± 59,00 g to 1704,57 ± 102,19 g, and stabilization with 210,52 ± 29,97 g to 761,50 ± 71,65 g. Summary: 1) the developed device allows to conduct an objective measurement of the foce of retention and stabilization of the prosthesis, as in conventional and implant prosthetics using different number of implants and implant different types of locking fasteners; 2. The degree of retention and stabilization of the prosthesis after implantation increased in the presence of one or two supporting implants, the changes of the indicators were more pronounced in the group of patients with fixation of the prosthesis on two implants; 3. Fixing that achieved by one supporting implant was enough to improve the quality of functionality and ease of use of a complete removable prosthesis of the lower jaw.

About the Authors

Ю. Паршин
ФГБОУ ВО «Первый Санкт-Петербургский государственный медицинский университет имени академика И.П. Павлова» Минздрава РФ
Russian Federation


Ю. Акульшин
ФГАОУ ВО СПбПУ
Russian Federation


References

1. Паршин Ю. В., Азарин Г. С., Волковой О. А. Щадящий метод имплантационного протезирования беззубой нижней челюсти // Институт стоматологии. 2016. №4 (73). С. 56-57.

2. Трезубов В. Н., Мишнев Л. М. Взаимодействие съемного протеза с организмом больного // Труды шестого съезда стоматологической ассоциации России. – М., 2000. – С. 409-411.

3. Трезубов В. Н., Щербаков А. С., Мишнев Л. М. Ортопедическая стоматология. Пропедевтика и основы частного курса: Учебник для мед. вузов / под ред. проф. В.Н. Трезубова. – СПб.: СпецЛит, 2014. – 480 с.

4. Трезубов В. Н., Щербаков А. С., Мишнев Л. М., Фадеев Р. А. Ортопедическая стоматология (факультетский курс): Учебник для медицинских вузов / под ред. проф. В. Н. Трезубова. 8 изд-е, перераб. и доп. – СПб.: ООО «Изд-во Фолиант», 2010. – 656 с.

5. Фрайден Дж. Современные датчики. Справочник. – М.: Техносфера, 2004. – 347 с.

6. Feine J. S., Carlsson G. E., Awad M. A., Chehade A., Duncan W. J., Gizani S. et al. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patient. Montreal, Quebec, May 24–25, 2002 // International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 2002. №17. Р. 601-602.

7. Grageda E., Rieck B. Metal-reinforced single implant mandibular overdenture retained by an attachment: A clinical report // J Prosthet Dent. 2014. №111. Р. 16-19.

8. Jingyin L., Shaoxia P., Jing D. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: A three-dimensional finite element analysis // Journal of dentistry. 2013. №41. Р. 242.

9. Krennmair G. The symphyseal single-tooth implant for anchorage of a mandibular complete denture in geriatric patients: a clinical report // The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2001. №16 (1). Р. 98104.

10. Marcus S. E., Kaste L. M., Brown L. J. Prevalence and demographic correlates of tooth loss among the elderly in the United States // Spec Care Dentist. 1994. №14. Р. 123-127.

11. Mericske-Stern R. Clinical evaluation of overdenture restorations supported by osseointegrated titanium implants: a retrospective study // International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 1990. №5. Р. 375383.

12. Thomason J. M., Feine J., Exley C., Moynihan P., Mьller F., Naert I. et al. Mandibular two implant-supported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients – the York Consensus Statement // Br Dent J. 2009. №207. Р. 185-186.


Review

For citations:


 ,  . Comparative study of the degree of fixation of complete removable prostheses of the lower jaw with attachment to another number of implants and their classical analogues. Parodontologiya. 2018;23(1):80-85. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25636/PMP.1.2018.1.16

Views: 302


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1683-3759 (Print)
ISSN 1726-7269 (Online)