Prevalence of maxillary gingival recession in patients with occlusal plane rotation
https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3759-2025-1025
Abstract
Relevance. Gingival recession is a periodontal condition characterized by the apical displacement of the gingival margin and subsequent root surface exposure, which may remain stable or progress over time. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of gingival recession in the maxilla of patients with occlusal plane rotation. The authors present findings on the gingival margin status of maxillary teeth in individuals with transverse occlusal plane rotation.
Materials and methods. The gingival margin status of 106 patients with transverse occlusal plane rotation in the maxilla was evaluated. Facial photometry was performed, and the angle of occlusal plane rotation was identified using rapid diagnostic techniques. The Miller classification system was employed to assess the severity of gingival recession.
Results. The analysis of gingival recession prevalence on the lateralized sides of the maxillary dental arch revealed a clear correlation between the gingival margin status and the occlusal plane tilt angle. At lower tilt angles, gingival recession corresponded to Miller Class I and was primarily observed on the high side (Supra Latus) of the tilt, particularly in the canine and premolar regions. As the tilt angle increased, Miller Classes II and III were more frequently noted, with recession predominantly occurring in the canine and premolar regions on the low side (Infra Latus). No cases of Miller Class IV gingival recession were observed among the participants.
Conclusion. The severity of gingival recession was directly correlated with the occlusal plane tilt angle: a greater tilt angle was associated with more severe recession, as classified by the Miller system. The findings indicate that gingival recession is more prevalent in the canine and premolar regions on the Supra Latus side compared to the Infra Latus side and occurs more frequently in these regions than in other tooth groups.
About the Authors
N. A. IvanovRussian Federation
Nikita A. Ivanov, DMD, PhD student, Assistant Professor, Department of the Pediatric Dentistry, Orthodontist, Dental Clinical and Diagnostic Centre
1 Paved Bortsov Square, Volgograd, Russian Federation, 400066
O. P. Ivanova
Russian Federation
Olga P. Ivanova, DMD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Department of the Pediatric Dentistry, Orthodontist, Dental Clinical and Diagnostic Centre
Volgograd
S. N. Khvostov
Russian Federation
Sergey N. Khvostov, DMD, Prosthodontist, Dental Clinical and Diagnostic Centre
Volgograd
E. A. Kiseleva
Russian Federation
Elena A. Kiseleva, DMD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Head of the Department of General Dentistry
Kemerovo
References
1. Smirnova SS. Choice of the method of elimination of gingival recession. Actual problems of dentistry. 2008;(4):13-19 (In Russ.). Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25920969
2. Redinova TL, Miniyarova AR, Krivonogova AI. Gingival recession: condition, disease. Russian Journal of Stomatology. 2024;17(3):23 29 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/rosstomat20241703123
3. Guttiganur N, Aspalli S, Sanikop MV, Desai A, Gaddale R, Devanoorkar A. Classification systems for gingival recession and suggestion of a new classification system. Indian J Dent Res. 2018;29(2):233-237 doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_207_17
4. Nosova MA, Sharov AN, Privalova KA, Volova LT, Trunin DA, Postnikov MA. Gum recession. Part I. Etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, classification (Literature review). The Dental Institute. of Dentistry. 2024:(1);86-89 (In Russ.). Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=65646884
5. Ivanova OP. The results of studying the parameters of the dental arches of complete removable prostheses in patients with different types of structure of the gnathic part of the face. Research journal of international studies. 2021;(7):75–80 (In Russ.). doi: 10.23670/IRJ.2021.109.7.048
6. Cortellini P, Bissada NF. Mucogingival conditions in the natural dentition: Narrative review, case definitions, and diagnostic considerations. J Periodontol. 2018;89 Suppl 1:S204-S213 doi: 10.1002/JPER.16-0671.
7. Dmitrienko SV, Ivanovа ОP, Dmitrienko DS, Jaradajkina MN, Soykher MG. Algorithm for detecting correlations be tween tooth size and dental arch parameters. Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research. 2013;9(3):380–383 (In Russ.). Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21156616
8. Kassab MM, Cohen RE. The etiology and prevalence of gingival recession. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134(2):220-225. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0137
9. Postnikov MA, Vinnik AV, Rakhimov RR, Kostionova-Ovod IA, Vinnik SV. Etiopathogenesis of gum recession: the current aspects. Aspirantskiy Vestnik Povolzhiya. 2022;22(4):27-32 (In Russ.). doi: 10.55531/2072-2354.2022.22.4.27-32
10. Zucchelli G, Mounssif I. Periodontal plastic surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2015;68(1):333-68. doi: 10.1111/prd.12059
11. Jati AS, Furquim LZ, Consolaro A. Gingival recession: its causes and types, and the importance of orthodontic treatment. Dental Press Journal of orthodontics. 2016;21(3):18-29. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.3.018-029
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Ivanov NA, Ivanova OP, Khvostov SN, Kiseleva EA. Prevalence of maxillary gingival recession in patients with occlusal plane rotation. Parodontologiya. 2025;30(1):41-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3759-2025-1025