Comparative evaluation of the effect of isolated different types of toothbrushes on the 3D parameters of the surface roughness of dental restorative materials

The study investigated the isolated effect of comparing 3 kinds of toothbrushes on the surface roughness of 2 dental restorative materials such as nanocomposite Filtek Ultimate (3M ESPE) and hybrid material Estelite Sigma Quick (Tokuyama Dental). The surface texture of the material was evaluated using the optical profilometer ZheScope and was defined 3D roughness parameters Sa and Sq. Measurement of the roughness parameters were performed before and after abrasion cycles. The impact on the surface of the samples was performed of the manual toothbrush Splat-Complete (SCM), of the electric brush Braun Oral-B Triumph 5000 (BOBT) and the sonic toothbrush Philips Sonicare FlexCare (PSFC). The samples of material Filtek Ultimate had a lower roughness value as compared to the roughness of the samples of material Estelite Sigma Quick before impact brushes. The smallest impact on the surface of the Filtek Ultimate material samples had the manual toothbrush Splat-complete. On the surface Estelite Sigma Quick smallest samples of material had the sound Philips Sonicare Flex Care electric and the Braun Oral-B Triumph 5000.

3D-параметры шероховатости Sa, Sq, a toothbrush, a restorative material, the nanocomposite Filtek Ultimate, the hybrid material Estelite Sigma Quick, 3D roughness parameters Sa and Sq, the optical profilometer ZeScope, the sonic toothbrush Philips Sonicare Flex-Care, the manual toothbrush Splat-Complete, the electric toothbrush Braun Oral-B Triumph 5000

1. Алямовский В. В., Багинский А. Л., Дуж А. Н. Влияние предметов и средств гигиены полости рта на эстетические реставрации зубов // Сибирское медицинское обозрение. 2012. №1. С. 57-60.

2. Орехова Л. Ю., Прохорова О. В., Каменева С. В., Кущенко Н. В., Сафарян М. О. Исследование влияния осветляющих зубных паст на поверхность нанонаполненного композитного материала // Стоматология. 2016. Т. 95. №1. С. 24-26.

3. Abu-bakr N., Han L., Okamoto A., Iwaku M. evaluation of the surface roughness of compomer by scanning microscopy // Dentar Materials Journal. 2001. №20 (2). Р. 172-180.

4. Boutros F. S. Effect of tooth brushing on the surface roughness of different resin composites/thesis submitted to the faculty of oral and dental medicine Cairo university. 2012.

5. Cavalcante L. M., Masouras K., Watts D. C., Pimenta L. A., Silikas N. Effect of nanofillers’ size on surface properties after toothbrush abrasion // American Journal of Dentistry. 2009. №22 (1). Р. 60-64.

6. Condon J. R., Ferracane J. L. Factors effecting dental composite wear in vitro // Journal Biomed Mater Res. 1997. №38 (4). Р. 303-313.

7. Silva da E. M., Sá de Rodrigues C. U., Dias D. A., Silva da S., Amaral C. M., Guimarães J. G. Effect of toothbrushing-mouthrinse-cycling on surface roughness and topography of nanofilled, microfilled, and microhybrid resin composites // Oper Dent. 2014. Sep-Oct. №39 (5). Р. 521-529.

8. Ergucu Z., Turkun L. S. Surface roughness of novel resin composites polished with one-step systems // Operative Dentistry. 2007. №32 (2). Р. 185-192.

9. Frankenberger R. Эстетика передних зубов с композитными реставрациями // Новое в стоматологии. 2007. №3. С. 1-24. Frankenberger R. Estetika perednih zubov s kompozitnimi restavraciymi // Novoe v stomatologii. 2007. №3. S. 1-24.

10. Heintze S. D., Forjanic M. Surface roughness of different dental materials before and after simulated toothbrushing in vitro // Oper Dent. 2005. №30. Р. 617-626.

11. Heintzea S. D., Forjanic M., Ohmiti K., Rousson V. Surface deterioration of dental materials after simulated toothbrushing in relation to brushing time and load // Dent Mater. 2010. Apr. №26 (4). Р. 306-319.

12. Janus J., Fauxpoint G., Arntz Y., Pelletier H., Etienne O. Surface roughness and morphology of three nanocomposites after two different polishing treatments by a multitechnique approach // Dent Mater. 2010. May. №26 (5). Р. 416-425.

13. Jones C. S., Billington R. W., Pearson G. J. The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations // Br. Dent. J. 2004. Vol. 196. №1. P. 42-45.

14. Joniot S. B., Grégoire G. L., Auther A. M., Roques Y. M. Three-dimensional optical profilometry analysisof surface states obtained after finishing sequences for three composite resins // Oper Dent. 2000. Jul-Aug. №25 (4). Р. 311-315.

15. Jung M., Sehr K., Klimek J. Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing // Oper Dent. 2007. Jan-Feb. №32 (1). Р. 45-52.

16. Mitra S. B., Wu D. & Holmes B.N. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials // Journal of the American Dental Association. 2003. №134 (10). Р. 1382-1390.

17. Monteiro B., Surface roughness of composite resins after simulated toothbrushing with different dentifrices // J Int Oral Health. 2015. Jul. №7 (7). Р. 1-5.

18. Nagarajan V. S., Jahanmir S., Thompson V. P. In vitro contact wear of dental composites // Dent Mater. 2004. №20 (1). Р. 63-71.

19. Tellefsen G., Liljeborg A., Johannsen A., & Johannsen G. The role of the toothbrush in the abrasion process // International Journal of Dental Hygiene. 2011. №9 (4). Р. 284-290.

20. Versteeg P. A., Piscaer M., Rosema N.A., Timmerman M.F., Van der Velden U., & Van der Weijden G.A. Tapered toothbrush filaments in relation to gingival abrasion, removal of plaque and treatment of gingivitis // International Journal of Dental Hygiene. 2008. №6 (3). Р. 174-182.

21. URL: http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/972489O/filtek-ultimate-tpp-ru-pdf.pdf.