Outcomes of reconstructive periodontal surgery with different types of barrier membranes
https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3759-2022-27-1-21-31
Abstract
Relevance. Reconstructive periodontal surgery is one of the most effective methods of restoring tooth-supporting apparatus damaged by microbial inflammation and destruction. For this purpose, they use non-resorbable and resorbable biomaterials, which act as a temporary barrier between the tissues with different mitotic potential during early healing. Since the properties of barrier membranes determine the degree of invasiveness and postoperative morbidity, and, finally, the success of the surgery, it is relevant to study the outcomes of periodontal reconstruction with one of the modern collagen membranes cross-linked by ribose.
Purpose. To comparatively assess the outcomes of periodontal reconstructions with a resorbable and non-resorbable barrier material.
Material and methods. The study is a prospective randomized blind controlled clinical trial. The study included 37 patients (14 men, 23 women) aged 45-65 years, who, after the initial therapy, underwent 62 guided tissue regenerations using e-PTFE and resorbable collagen membrane cross-linked by ribose. The study compared the clinical and radiographic results before and 18 months after the surgery. We evaluated the probing depth (periodontal pocket), gingival recession level, loss of clinical attachment level, width and height of periodontal infrabony defects, gain in clinical attachment level. The material was statistically processed using StatSoft STATISTICA 10.0.1011 for Windows. The statistical unit is a periodontal defect.
Results. In the postoperative period, the main (31%) and control (42%) groups exhibited the areas of membrane exposure; 16 periodontal defects, only in the control group, demonstrated the extensive membrane exposure, of which 11 membranes were prematurely removed due to infection of the reconstruction site. In the main group, fibrin allowed exposed area healing in the usual time without medical assistance. After 18 months, the gain in the clinical attachment level was 3.5 mm in the main group versus 2.8 mm in the control group (at p=0.03) with a significant decrease in the probing depth compared to that before treatment; the level of recession also changed positively, although not significantly. The type of periodontal defect (the parameter is higher in three-wall and two-wall defects) appeared to remarkably influence the gain in clinical attachment level.
Conclusion. The study evidenced that the resorbable cross-linked collagen membrane demonstrated clinically acceptable outcome of the damaged periodontium reconstruction due to, first of all, increased predictability of the course of the early postoperative period, a significant reduction in morbidity and invasiveness of intervention.
About the Authors
M. D. PerovaRussian Federation
Marina D. Perova, DMD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Krasnodar
A. Yu. Ananich
Russian Federation
Artem Yu. Ananich, DMD, PhD Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Krasnodar
I. A. Sevostyanov
Russian Federation
Igor A. Sevostyanov, DMD, PhD, Oral surgeon, Dental Polyclinic
Krasnodar
I. I. Fedorov
Russian Federation
Ilya I. Fedorov, DMD, PhD Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Krasnodar
E. S. Ovcharenko
Russian Federation
Evgeniya S. Ovcharenko, DMD, PhD, Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of Dentistry, School of Continuing Education and Postgraduate Training
Krasnodar
D. D. Samokhvalova
Russian Federation
Dina D. Samokhvalova, DMD, PhD Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Krasnodar
References
1. Перова МД. Ткани пародонта: норма, патология, пути восстановления. Научно-практическая монография для последипломного образования. Москва: Триада Лтд. 2005:312. Режим доступа: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19531838 Perova MD. Tkani parodonta: norma, patologiya, puti vosstanovleniya. Nauchno-prakticheskaya monografiya dlya poslediplomnogo obrazovaniya. Moskva: Triada Ltd. 2005:312. (In Russ). Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19531838
2. Sheikh Z, Hamdan N, Ikeda Y, Grynpas M, Ganss B, Glogauer M. Natural graft tissues and synthetic biomaterials for periodontal and alveolar bone reconstructive applications. Biomaterials Research. 2017;21:9. doi:10.1186/s40824-017-0095-5.
3. Sculean A, Stavropoulos A, Windisch P, Keglevich T, Karring T, Gera I. Healing of human intrabony defects following regenerative periodontal therapy with a bovine-derived xenograft and guided tissue regeneration. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2004;8(2):70-74. doi: 10.1007/s00784-004-0254-7
4. Omar O, Elgali I, Dahlin Ch, Thomsen P. Barrier membranes: More than the barrier effect? Journal Of Clinical Periodontology. 2019;46:103-123. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13068
5. Barbeck M, Lorenz J, Kubesch A, Bohm N, Booms P, Choukroun J, Sader R, et al. Porcine dermis-derived collagen membranes induce implantation bed vascularization via multinucleated giant cells: A physiological reaction? The Journal of oral implantology. 2015;41:e238–e251. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-14-00274
6. Al-Maawi S, Vorakulpipat C, Orlowska A, Zrnc TA, Sader RA, Kirkpatrick CJ, Ghanaati S. In vivo Implantation of a bovine-derived collagen membrane leads to changes in the physiological cellular pattern of wound healing by the induction of multinucleated giant cells: an adverse reaction? Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018;6:1- doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00104
7. Ghanaati S, Kirkpatrick C, Kubesch A, Lorenz J, Sader R, Udeabor S, Barbeck M, et al. Induction of multinucleated giant cells in response to small sized bovine bone substitute (Bio-Oss TM) results in an enhanced early implantation bed vascularization. Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery. 2014;4:150. doi: 10.4103/2231-0746.147106
8. Franz S, Rammelt S, Scharnweber D, Simon J. Immune responses to implants. A review of the implications for the design of immunomodulatory biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2011;32:6692-6709. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.078
9. Stavropoulos A, Chiantella G, Costa D, Steigmann M, Windisch P, Sculean A. Clinical and histologic evaluation of a granular bovine bone biomaterial used as an adjunct to GTR with a bioresorbable bovine pericardium collagen membrane in the treatment of intrabony defects. Journal of periodontology. 2001;82:462-470. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100331
10. Patil VA, Masters KS. Engineered Collagen Matrices. Bioengineering. 2020;7,4:163. doi 10.3390/bioengineering7040163
11. Lin Z, Nica C, Sculean A, Asparuhova MB. Positive effects of three-dimensional collagen-based matrices on the behavior of osteoprogenitors. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:708830. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.708830
12. Asparuhova MB, Stähli A, Guldener K, Sculean A. A novel volume-stable collagen matrix induces changes in the behavior of primary human oral fibroblasts, periodontal ligament, and endothelial cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;22(8):4051. doi: 10.3390/ijms22084051
13. Twardowski T, Fertala A, Orgel J, San Antonio J. Type I collagen and collagen mimetics as angiogenesis promoting superpolymers. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2007;13(35):3608-3621. doi: 10.2174/138161207782794176
14. Яременко АИ, Рубникович СП, Нейзберг ДМ, Ерохин АИ, Орехова ЛЮ, Атрушкевич ВГ, Денисова ЮЛ. Оценка регенераторного потенциала альвеолярно-периодонтальных дефектов. Весці нацыянальнай акадэміі навук беларусі. Серыя медыцынскіх навук. 2021;18(3):304-314. doi:10.29235/1814-6023-2021-18-3-304-314 Yaremenko AI., Rubnikovich SP., Neyzberg DM., Erokhin AI., Orekhova LYu., Atruchkevich VG., Denisova YuL., Loboda ES. A regenerative approach to the classification of the defects in the periodontal and alveolar ridge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Medical series. 2021;18(3):304-314. (In Russ.) doi: 10.29235/1814-6023-2021-18-3-304-314
Review
For citations:
Perova MD, Ananich AY, Sevostyanov IA, Fedorov II, Ovcharenko ES, Samokhvalova DD. Outcomes of reconstructive periodontal surgery with different types of barrier membranes. Parodontologiya. 2022;27(1):21-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3759-2022-27-1-21-31