Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of methods for removing dental plaque

According to recent WHO studies, more than 80 percent of Russia’s population suffers from inflammatory periodontal diseases on average, and after 40 years their prevalence increases to 90процента. In recent years there has been a steady increase in the incidence among young and middle-aged people. The existing and continuing to expand the range of methods and tools for conducting this intervention poses a problem for the practicing physician to choose the most effective of them taking into account the aggregate of all their positive and negative properties. The aim of the study was to study in the experiment the ultrastructure of the tooth surface after the removal of tooth deposits and biofilms by various methods.

As a material for the study, the teeth of patients of both sexes of the permanent bite (60 samples), removed by periodontal indications with approximately the same number of tooth deposits, and were used. The surface treatment of the teeth was performed in vitro. In the course of the work, six groups were formed, each of which was examined for 10 teeth after removal of tooth deposits in various ways. With a visual evaluation of the electron diffraction patterns, a significant difference in the relief of the tooth root surface after its treatment by various methods is found. The ultrastructure of the tooth surface was studied after the removal of the tooth deposits by various methods. The greatest number of tooth deposits is determined after the manual method with the use of hooks to remove the denticulate deposits, the smallest-using the ultrasound method in combination with the technology vector.

1. Buljakov R. T, Sabitova R. I., Guljaeva O. A. Klinicheskaja ocenka sostojani-ja tkanej parodonta posle konservativnogo lechenija hronicheskogo general-izovannogo parodontita tjazheloj stepeni s primeneniem metodov razrushenija bioplenki // Parodontologija. 2015. № 1. S. 68-77.

2. Volinskaja T B. Differencial’nyj podhod v vybore poroshka dlja vozdushno-abrazivnoj obrabotki zubov pri lechenii bol’nyh s vospalitel’nymi zabolevanijami parodonta // Stomatologija. 2013. № 2. S. 27-32.

3. Grudjanov A. I. Zabolevanija parodonta.— M.: Izd-vo «Medicinskoe infor-macionnoe agentstvo», 2009.— 336 s.

4. Dmitrieva L. A., Jashkova V. V. Issledovanie ispol’zovanija zonospeci-ficheskih kjuret po dannym svetoopticheskogo izuchenija // Parodontologija. 2015. № 2.S.34-36.

5. Kuz’mina E. M. i dr. Stomatologicheskaja zabolevaemost’ naselenija Ros-sii. Sostojanie tkanej parodonta i slizistoj obolochki rta: rezul’taty epidemio-logicheskogo stomatologicheskogo obsledovanija naselenija Rossii / pod red. O. O. Janushevich. - M.: MGMSU, 2009.

6. Kunin A. A., Erina S. V., Popova T A. i dr. Vlijanie razlichnyh sposobov snjati-ja zubnyh otlozhenij na mikrostrukturu tverdyh tkanej zuba // Parodontologija. 2010. № 2. S. 33-36.

7. Rabinovich I. M. Otdalennye rezul’taty lechenija vospalitel’nyh zabolevanij parodonta s ispol’zovaniem sistemy Vector // Klinicheskaja stomatologija. 2011. № 4. S. 38.

8. Sarapul’ceva M. V., Shljahtova I. A. Sovremennye metody snjatija zubnyh otlozhenij. Uroven’ bolevogo simptoma u pacientov pri primenenii raznyh tipov ul’trazvukovyh skejlerov // Parodontologija. 2009. № 4. S. 26-31.

9. Eick S., Bender P, Flury S. at al. In vitro evaluation of surface roughness, adhesion of periodontal ligament fibroblasts, and streptococcus gordonii fol-lowingroot instrumentation with gracey Curettes and subsequent polishing with diamond-coated curretes // Clin Oral Investig. 2012. Аpr. № 17.