The use of fiberotomy patients before and after orthodontic treatment tight regulations incisors

Relevance of the research topic. The frequency of the spread of the crowded position of the teeth in the frontal parts of the jaws among other dental anomalies, according to R. Ferro (2016) is 48% of the number of all examined by him. Due to the wide prevalence of anomalies in the optimization of orthodontic treatment of patients with a crowded position of the teeth continue to attract researchers. Studies of a number of authors have shown, the prevalence of malocclusion is an average of 33.7 per cent. The frequency of anomalies of occlusion, combined with the close position of the teeth in the anterior region is increased to 59-73%. The role of the third molars in the formation of the crowded position of the teeth continues to be clarifed. The goal is to increase the effciency of orthodontic treatment of patients with kuchennym the position of the teeth in the frontal parts of the jaws due to ulzibat and vibropneumotables.

Materials and methods. In the study, analysis of histological preparations 35 patients aged 16-25 with kuchennym position of the cutters who underwent orthodontic treatment by the conventional method with the use of permanent equipment. Three groups were identifed: 1st-control, 2nd-before applying non – removable equipment performed fbrotomy and 3rd-after removal of non – removable equipment performed fbrotomy according to the standard procedure in the Department of maxillofacial surgery and dentistry Sammu. Results. In the examined three groups of patients, the revealed structural changes in the gingival mucosa indicate its damage and the presence of chronic productive inflammation as a response to physiological response to hardware orthodontic treatment. The results of comparison of microphotographs of multilayer flat epithelium of the mucous membrane of the alveolar process of the jaws in three groups of patients were the answer to the task of the study.

Summary. The histological structure of the attached mucous-periosteal cover of the alveolar process of the upper and lower jaw in the area of the crowded position of the teeth before orthodontic treatment was studied for the frst time with the help of morphological methods of research this allowed to reveal distinctive morphological features in this group of patients. In the comparative aspect, the morphological structure of the mucous-periosteal cover of the alveolar process of the upper and lower jaw after orthodontic treatment and in the retention period in the main and control groups of patients was studied, which deepened the knowledge of the processes of ligamentous apparatus restructuring depending on the method of treatment.

1. Anikienko A.A. Izmenenija v zubnyh i okolozubnyh tkanjah pri vertikal’nom peremeshhenii (vytjazhenii) zubov: Dis. … d-ra med. nauk.— M., 1963.— 316 s.

2. Anikienko A.A., Pankratova N.V., Persin L.S. Sut’ apparaturnogo ortodonticheskogo lechenija i ego podchinenie fiziologicheskim zakonam razdrazhenija.— М.: Medicinskoe informacionnoe agenstvo, 2010.— 58 s.

3. Persin L.S. Vidy zubocheljustnyh anomalij i ih klassificirovanie.— M., 2006.—32 s.

4. Persin L.S., Elizarova V.M., D’jakova S.V. Stomatologija detskogo vozrasta. 5-e izd., pererab. i dop.— M.: Medicina, 2006.— 640 s.

5. Kalvelis D.A. Biomorfologicheskie osnovy ortodonticheskogo lechenija.— Riga, 1961.— 220 s.

6. Rubinov I.S. Fiziologicheskie osnovy fiziologii.— М.: Medicina, 1965.— 350 s.

7. Falin L.I. Gistologija i jembriologija polosti rta i zubov.— M., 1963.— S. 133-192.

8. Postnikov M.A., Trunin D.A., Bajrikov I.M., Usikova L.A., Ustina M.V. Primenenie cirkuljarnoj fibrotomii u detej dlja profilaktiki recidiva zubocheljustno-licevyh anomalij posle aktivnoj fazy ortodonticheskogo lechenija // Ortodontija. 2015. № 1 (69). S. 48-56.

9. Antolic I., Pavsic I., Belic D. Epidemiologische und bioanalytische Untersuchung der Engstande und ihre Behandlung // Stomatol. DDR. 1985. Bd. 35. № 5. S. 279-282.

10. Arat Z. M., Rubenduz М. Changes in dentoalveolar and facial heights during early and late growth periods: a longitudinal study // Angle Orthod. 2005. № 75 (l). P. 69-74.

11. Battagel I.M. Evaluation de I’encombrement sans mesure du perimeter d’arcade // Rev. Orthop. Dento-Fac. 1997. Vol. 31. № 2. P. 227-336.

12. Bjork A., Skieller V. Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible: a synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years // Eur. J. Orthod. 1983. Vol. 5. № 1. P. 1-46.

13. Bonneval Н. Photogrammйtrie generate.— 1972.— Vol. 1/4.

14. Brunelle J. A., Bhat M., Lipton J.A. Prevalence and distribution of selected occlusal characteristics in the US population // J. Dent. Res. 1996. № 75. P. 706-713.

15. Eberting J. J., Straja S.R., Tuncay O.C. Treatment time, outcome, and patient satisfaction comparisons Damon and conventional brackets // Clin. Orthod. Res. 2001. № 4. P. 228-234.

16. Forsberg С. M., Brattstrom V., Malmberg C.E. Ligature wires and elastometric rings: two methods of ligature, and their association with microbial colonization of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacilli // EJO. 1991.Vol. 13. P. 416-420.

17. HaiTadine N. W. T., Birnie D.J. The clinical use of Activa self-ligating brackets // Am.J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop. 1996. Vol. 109. P. 319-328.

18. Harradine, N. Self-ligsting brackets and treatment efficiency // Clin. Orthod. Res. 2001. № 4. P. 220-227.

19. Haruk I. Т., Little R.M. Early versus late treatment of crowding first premolar extraction case postretention evaluation of stability and relapse // Angle Orthod. 1998. Vol. 68. № l. P. 61-68.